Conventional wisdom about how to land a job seems to be shifting — and some new advice from an executive recruiter is turning heads.
The counsel? Lose the engagement ring for interviews.
Image Credit: Flickr CC/Armand
In a post for the job recruitment site LinkedIn, executive recruiter and career counselor Bruce Hurwitz discusses a female client who was having difficulty landing a job, and she didn’t know why.
Her interviewing skills and presentation were fine.
The problem, Hurwitz maintains, was actually that the woman had an engagement ring the size of “the Hope Diamond.”
Hurwitz argues that a ring can be a disadvantage for two major reasons:
“When a man sees that ring he immediately assumes you are high maintenance. When the woman at the office who has the largest diamond on her finger, sees that ring, she will realize that if you are hired she will fall to second place and will, therefore, not like you. Lose the ring!”
The woman apparently called Hurwitz two weeks later to thank him directly. She’d secured a job after all, and the only thing she’d done differently was not wear her shiny rock.
Image Credit: Kevin Mazur/WireImage/Getty Images
Unfortunately, marital status bias in job recruiting scenarios is nothing new. A recent Stanford study found:
Three studies documented effects of marital status on perceptions of employees or prospective employees. In Experiment 1, participants rated a married female job applicant as less suitable for employment than a single counterpart.
In Experiment 2, participants again perceived a female job applicant less favorably when she was married; in contrast, a male applicant was perceived more favorably when married.
In Experiment 3, participants predicted that a recently married woman’s job performance and dedication would decline, whereas a recently married man’s dedication was predicted to rise; this difference made participants more willing to lay off the woman than the man.
Hurwitz goes on to argue that not wearing a ring and refraining from mentioning your pending nuptials isn’t lying:
“Not telling an employer that you plan to get married is fine. It is none of her business. It would only be relevant if, let’s say, you needed some time off in the not too distant future.”
Hurwitz’s advice has rendered some serious online blowback, with many calling it sexist:
Great interview tips from #BruceHurwitz. I’ll make sure to keep my ankles covered while I’m at it too. ???????????? http://bit.ly/2bos1js
— Em (@ouiemmy) August 24, 2016
This #POS recruiter said the most sexist thing ever in his interview tips article. http://bit.ly/2bFN7pi
— College Candy (@CollegeCandy) August 22, 2016
#BruceHurwitz’s advice to women interviewees to “lose the rock” isn’t financial advice; it’s decidedly sexist. http://bit.ly/2borRsq
— Rachel Lau (@rachel_lau) August 19, 2016
My response to that wack @LinkedIn post on engagement rings & work: As if, Bruce Hurwitz. http://bit.ly/2bFLLuV
— Michelle Ruiz (@michelleruiz) August 19, 2016
The now-controversial job recruiter has this response to all the online criticism he’s received:
Funny. So much criticism of my 2 articles http://bit.ly/2born5k and http://bit.ly/2bFLesY yet I have100s of new followers.#LoveTheHaters
— Bruce Hurwitz (@HurwitzStaffing) August 17, 2016
Whether or not you find Hurwitz’s advice wrong, or even offensive, it does beg the question: do employers notice more personal things like engagement rings, and does it affect hiring practices?
ajax_url = “http://bit.ly/2bzwBry;;
Do you find this advice helpful?
No, quite frankly I find it sexist.
Yes, he makes a very astute point.
The post Expert Suggests Women Shouldn’t Wear an Engagement Ring on Interviews If They Want the Job appeared first on Independent Journal Review.
Source: independent journal
The post Expert Suggests Women Shouldn’t Wear an Engagement Ring on Interviews If They Want the Job appeared first on .@tonygreene113.
